M. T. (Tobin) Anderson
1961-
Life:
Relatively
little biographical information is available about Anderson, who
explains “I
have a very New Englandy horror of self-promotion, and for that reason,
I
haven’t put anything about me online” (Shoemaker 98).
He studied literature at Harvard and
To
comments that his books are unusually complex, he says:
We live in a culture of corporate-sponsored narrative, which is a culture of underwritten endumbening. In an attempt to reach an ever wider audience, television, movies, magazines, and even publishers rely on three elements pernicious to complicated narrative: first the sapping of particularity (for fear that eccentricity will frighten off potential viewers, or more dangerously, encourage the splintering of mass demographics); second, the simplification of narrative (because of an assumption that the bulk of people want to hear over and over again the stories they have already heard); and third, the pursuit of anything, be it tumbling helicopters or showering cheerleaders, that might constitute “action.”
This creates a vicious cycle, however. As children are raised on simpler and simpler narratives, they become acclimated to that banality, and grow distrustful of anything that deviates from it. (Shoemaker 99)
Anderson explains that he wrote
the
first two parts of Feed just before
the terrorist attacks of 9-11; the day after, while in a music store,
he
overheard snatches of conversation that later made it into the novel
(e.g.,
“Dude! I think the truffle is totally undervalued”) and realized for
some
people, “it was as if nothing ever happened. . . . these two statements
stuck
in my head as a graphic illustration of what so many of us do when
confronted
with disaster. We turn away.
We refuse to be confronted.” (Blasingame 98)
The
book ends with the words “Everything must go. . .” being repeated in
progressively smaller type, as if the words themselves were
disappearing:
That has particular meaning within the story, but also in a broader sense, that willingly or unwillingly, we’re going to have to change radically the way we live. Our lives as Americans are built on superstructures that are not self-sustaining. Our nation has a vicious prejudice against anything that doesn’t yield quick profit. There’s little sense of long-term planning, and there’s open scorn when ethical questions arise in opposition to short-term business goals. (Blasingame 99)
Feed as Simple Love Story
At the level of
plot, Feed can be seen as a basic relationship story –
boy meets
girl, they fall in love, discover they have different expectations of
the relationship; she dies and he
can’t respond properly. It's such a basic love
story that it was incarnated in the 1970s under the generic title Love
Story in Erich Segal's weepy best-seller. This is, with the
exception of Violet's death, a pretty typical adolescent scenario - or,
indeed, the story of any kind of love. One member of the
relationship may be planning a never-ending future of togetherness, the
other is already planning his next relationship. Eventually, such
relationships will fall apart; this one seems particularly tough
because Violet is dying, and we expect that Titus should be more
attentive to her.
When Anderson is on record against the
simplification of narrative (see above), we might question why he
chooses such a simple narrative on which to hang his novel - indeed,
students in class asked precisely this question. The answer lies
in part in the book's satiric nature; if Anderson's primary purpose is
to satirize our society, the plot itself needs to be simple, or plot
complications might get in the way of the satire.
Feed as a Satire
Feed is best
thought of as a satire on
consumer culture with its obsession with immediate gratification, on
the
computer-mediated society, and our obsession with instant
communications.
One
element in our culture is a tendency to conceive of everything in
relation to
patterns mediated for us by popular, commercial culture: “It’s
impossible for
us to think of life without conceiving of it in images that are taken
from
movies, from songs, from ads, all of which are challenging us to be
better
consumers rather than better people.” (
Everything I think of when I think of really living, living to the full – all my ideas are just the opening credits of sitcoms. See what I mean? My idea of life, it’s what happens when they’re rolling the credits. My god. What am I, without the feed? It’s all from the feed credits. My idea of real life. (174 - page references to the test are to the hardcover edition)
Anderson calls our attention to
language in various ways. For instance, one
mark of Titus’s difference from the other kids in his group - the
reason that Violet is interested in him - is his ability to
describe things in language. Unlike the others, Violet tells him, he
uses
metaphor (52 - actually, here and elsewhere he is actually using simile,
but the point is that he is
capable of figurative language), and we do note that his descriptions
of the world around him are effective. Violet’s father intentionally
uses convoluted syntax and
difficult words; his style of speech would never be described as
effective, but his purpose in generating more difficult language is to
resist the tendency to oversimplify (in a similar way, some Marxist
theorists insist on using convoluted, dense prose to express their
ideas as a means of resisting the tyranny of conventional
language). Marty gets a “speech tattoo” that renders him almost
incomprehensible - an emblem both of the tendency to meaningless
phrases replacing actual conversation and the domination of corporate
consumer culture, since his tattoo randomly inserts a brand name
("Nike") into his speech.
The book's slang
is not so much a part of its satire as an attempt to extrapolate
current usages into future developments. For example, Anderson
discusses his use of the word “unit”: “There are certain linguistic
positions that we as
Americans tend to fill with a slang term.
Like the ‘buddy’ position, used as a filler to reaffirm the
connection between
interlocutors. . . . I started to think about these idiomatic
place-holders,
and I just inserted fabricated ones – ‘unit’ and so on.” (Blasingame 99)
Marc Aronson cites as evidence of an
enduring tradition of adolescent anger Arthur Rimbaud's Deliriums:
"I will make gashes over my entire body, I will tattoo myself. . . you
will see, I will howl in the streets. I wish to become quite mad
with rage." The image of "gashes over [the] entire body" resonates with
the vogue in Feed for creating artificial lesions, especially
Quendy's "fashion statement" (153). But where Rimbaud's image
expresses rage at the world he finds himself in, Quency's lesions are
adopted with the sole aim of out-voguing Calista. This conversion
of protest/rage to fashion has occurred in our world, as well, where
the "punk look" and piercings which originally expressed young people's
anger at the adult society has become, to some extent, normative.
The same applies to the fashion vogue
in Feed of "Riot Gear" (128): "It's Riot Gear. It's
retro. It's beat up to look like one of the big twentieth-century
riots. It's been big since earlier this week." The Riot
Gear fashions are identified with specific acts of social protest: Kent
State, (128 - a 1970 anti-war protest in which four college
students were killed by National Guardsmen called in to counter the
protest) Stonewall,
(130 - a 1969 police raid on a gay bar in Greenwich Village erupted
into violent confrontations between cops and gays), and Watts (a 1965
outbreak in response to frustration with efforts to thwart civil-rights
gains). Yet the clothing the kids wear has been totally removed
from the original social context of the riots, and indeed, the names
have become nothing more than labels to kids whose concept of history
is expressed by Titus's reliance on the feed: "You can look things up
automatic, like science and history, like if you want to know which
battles of the Civil War George Washington fought in and shit." (39)
A.
Waller
Hastings
Professor
of English
Northern
State University
Aberdeen,
SD 57401
Return
to Wally Hastings' Children's Literature Page
Return
to Wally Hastings' Homepage
Page last updated April 30, 2005