I've said that
one of the best ways to understand a society is
to look at the art, music, literature it produces.
Baroque style
of 17th century/Rococco an Neo-Classical Art
of 18th,
Romantic and Realistic styles of 19th century
certainly
reflection of those ages. 20th century
artistic styles likewise
tell you a lot about our particular century.
Problem is--
dozens of styles. Nevertheless, regardless
of style--three major
trends much of 20th century art has in common.
As an example, consider the development of atonal
music in 20th century.
Before the 20th
century, serious music, even the music of the
greatest composers, was pretty easy for the
average person to
understand and enjoy. Reason: followed
common and easily
understood patterns. (I, IV, V, V7, I).
20th century, however, many
of the most important composers began to move
away from
these patterns toward what is called atonal
music. Music
without tones? No--but music without
a home key. There is a
pattern: 12 tones. But the pattern is
not at all easy to
recognize. One must have exceptionally
good ear, special
training. Obviously less accessible--how
many listen to music
of Arnold Shoenberg? Also clear tendency
to glorify art
itself: what were asked to admire here is
the creativity of the
composer. Also clear, tendency to undercut
traditional
standards and values--traditional idea: music
should have
pretty melodies, beautiful harmonies.
Not so with atonal
music.
Other forms of 20th century music even more extreme, e.g. aleatoric music. Aleatoric music is music produced by chance, random collections of sounds.
Stravinsky:
Rite of Spring ("raw sound
freed from melody and harmony")
Cage:
random, computer generated
music: clearly violating
traditional idea that music
should follow pattern.
Challenge to virtually
all traditional ideas of what music
should be. One
of Cage's compositions (4:37) the composer sits
down at the piano--and
does nothing for 4:37!!!
Very similar
things happening in the other arts.
Surrealism
In some ways, best
example of trends I talk about. Surrealism a style, not just of painting,
but of music and
literature as
well.
1. Challenge
to traditional standards clear. What
the rest of
us regard as reality isn't truly reality--
subconcious
must be reflected. Result is what most
of us would
consider a distortion of reality--but
surrealists
regard as true reality. Automatism,
accident rather
than logical control. Also,
emphasis on
things rest of us would find
disturbing in
the extreme--and saying these things
are good!
Elevation of imagination to extreme
importance.
"Only the marvelous is beautiful."
In all these
arts, there is a deliberate attempt to shock the
aesthetic sense, to produce something that
will challenge
existing standards. In fact, in much
modern art, the only
value in a piece is its shock value--and the
more shocking, the
more likely the art world is to regard a work
as important.
Maplethorpe: pictures of homosexual men.
Serrano: Piss---.
Exhibit that requires walking on American
flags. This kind of
thing rare or non-existent in earlier art--which
tended to
reinforce religion, patriotism, traditional
standards. Only in
20th century would such things be regarded
as art.
Literature:
20th century
literature, too, reflects the trends I mention
above. Seen in virtually every genre--poetry,
plays, short
stories, novels--
Poetry:
Earlier ages, poetry most accessible of literary genres.
Very
popular! Natural attraction of rhyme, meter--memorable.
20th
century, however, poetry no longer nearly as accessible.
T.S Eliot