Presentation rubric

ENDANGERED SPECIES PRESENTATION

NAMES________________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________

DATE____________________________

*Criteria* *to be assessed*	*Exemplary (5)*	*Acceptable (4)*	*Partial Success (3)*	*Needs work (2)*
Plan to save the animal	is easy to understand can be implemented with no difficulty	is easy to understand can be implemented with little difficulty	is understandable with some explanation can be implemented, but with some difficulty	is difficult to understand would be difficult to implement
Format of Power Point presentation	has five slides is completely correct in grammar and spelling *title page and slides are easy to read and make creative use of technological resources	has five slides is mostly correct in grammar and spelling *title page and slides are easy to read	has five slides has no more than five grammar and spelling errors *title page and slides can be read with some difficulty	has fewer than five slides has more than five grammar and spelling errors *title page and sides can't be read
Quality of presentation	each member of the group participated in the presentation the information was clearly presented each group member was well-prepared group members showed enthusiasm	each member of the group participated in the presentation to some extent some of the information was clearly presented most group members was well-prepared group member showed enthusiasm	two students dominated the presentation it was difficulty to understand much of the information some group members were well-prepared one or two members of the group showed enthusiasm	only one member of the group participated in the presentation the information was not at all understandable none of the group members were well-prepared no group members showed enthusiasm
Organization of presentation	research done by the group was clearly articulated the order of the presentation was completely logical	research done by the group was presented the order of the presentation was mostly logical	some evidence of the research done by the group was presented the order of the presentation was somewhat confusing	the research done by the group was not evident there was no logical order to the presentation

Total _________________
Comments:

back to lesson

*Criteria* *to be assessed*	*Exemplary (5)*	*Acceptable (4)*	*Partial Success (3)*	*Needs work (2)*
Plan to save the animal	is easy to understand can be implemented with no difficulty	is easy to understand can be implemented with little difficulty	is understandable with some explanation can be implemented, but with some difficulty	is difficult to understand would be difficult to implement
Format of Power Point presentation	has five slides is completely correct in grammar and spelling *title page and slides are easy to read and make creative use of technological resources	has five slides is mostly correct in grammar and spelling *title page and slides are easy to read	has five slides has no more than five grammar and spelling errors *title page and slides can be read with some difficulty	has fewer than five slides has more than five grammar and spelling errors *title page and sides can't be read
Quality of presentation	each member of the group participated in the presentation the information was clearly presented each group member was well-prepared group members showed enthusiasm	each member of the group participated in the presentation to some extent some of the information was clearly presented most group members was well-prepared group member showed enthusiasm	two students dominated the presentation it was difficulty to understand much of the information some group members were well-prepared one or two members of the group showed enthusiasm	only one member of the group participated in the presentation the information was not at all understandable none of the group members were well-prepared no group members showed enthusiasm
Organization of presentation	research done by the group was clearly articulated the order of the presentation was completely logical	research done by the group was presented the order of the presentation was mostly logical	some evidence of the research done by the group was presented the order of the presentation was somewhat confusing	the research done by the group was not evident there was no logical order to the presentation